The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Rough survival test at Sandvik Coromant

Four engineers in front of a microscope. From the left: Jorge Canales, Emelie Haettner, Julius Modin, Alexander Graves
From the left: Jorge Canales, Emelie Haettner, Julius Modin, Alexander Graves.

Emelie Haettner, PhD-student in Sentio, reports back from a promising first survival test performed at Sandvik Coromant in Västberga. The unprotected semiconductor microstructures that were printed on tool inserts managed to survive the rough cutting process in the workshop. The results are promising for developing sensors that will work under such extreme conditions.

Why did you go to Sandvik Coromant in Västberga?
I went there to test how the semiconductor structures that I had deposited on tool inserts would withstand the harsh conditions during metal cutting. The structures were un-coated and therefore highly exposed to both mechanical wear and high temperatures. This was the first test using structures fabricated on this type of surface, and the main purpose was, out of curiosity, to get a rough idea of how lithographically patterned structures behave in such an experiment.

Additionally, I visited to see the facilities and meet some of the people at Sandvik involved in the Sentio project, and I was given a tour of their laboratories.

What did you learn?
We tested three patterned inserts under different cutting conditions by varying the process settings. I learned how metal cutting is performed and how the insert surface is affected during the process. For instance, I discovered that stainless-steel chips sliding along the surface become sticky at elevated temperatures, leading to thin deposits of stainless steel on the insert surface. This means that any future structures will need a protective coating, not only to provide mechanical durability but also to prevent electrical short-circuiting.

How did the experiments go?
It went very well. The structures turned out to be remarkably robust. I was initially concerned that they might delaminate, but in general they remained intact after cutting, except in areas where even the surface of the insert itself had been worn away.

What's the next steps?
We are planning an experiment at MAX IV (FlexPES beamline) to investigate possible chemical changes of the semiconductor surface at different distances from the insert’s contact zone. Since the temperature gradient during cutting is extremely steep, it would be interesting to see whether this gradient is reflected in the chemical composition of the surface as well.

Photos: Susanne Norgren

Close up picture of a cutting tool.
Cutting tool tip with printed semiconductor microstructures that are invisible to the naked eye.
Two people in front of a microscope image of a sensor on a cutting steel tip.
Microscope image of semiconductor microstructures printed on a cutting tool tip.
Emelie Haettner filming the cutting steel with the sensor during metal cutting.
Filming the cutting tool during metal cutting process.